When a Baby Is Being Born How Do They Come Out Head Face Down

(Natural News) A shocking new report published in the New England Periodical of Medicine reveals that when meaning women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous ballgame charge per unit, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-axiomatic from the data published in a new report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-nineteen Vaccine Rubber in Meaning Persons." Just as disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention past a Life Site News commodity, nosotros checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, nosotros were able to confirm two things:

1. Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yep, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and fabricated a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-upwards to endeavor to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. Just the study data actually show quite the oppose.

Here'due south how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table iv from the written report, shown below, reveals that a full of 827 meaning women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their beginning vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You take to read the fine print below the table to come across this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their showtime or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these meaning women who were vaccinated.

It is of import to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their tertiary trimester, by definition.

Thus, the written report authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put another mode, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the starting time time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the outset 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the first twenty weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an accolade in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand fob to make it appear that vaccines are safe for meaning women. In reality, they seem to exist killing more than 4 out of five unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at to the lowest degree in this data set. (Information technology's a small gear up of 127 pregnant women, then nosotros'd like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to go a more articulate motion-picture show.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple style to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and l limes, with a scientific discipline study asking the question, "What pct of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and achieve the number 50. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 full piece of fruit, and so they declare, "50% of lemons are yellowish" because it'due south l/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't possibly exist included because they're limes, not lemons. Then the right math is l/50, which ways 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the correct respond.

In this scientific discipline newspaper, they are using 827 every bit the denominator, fifty-fifty when 700 out of those 827 women were simply vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since pregnant women aren't time travelers, they tin can't go back in fourth dimension and report a spontaneous abortion from months before.

If vaccine scientists either can't do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — and so "scientific discipline" has already failed its cadre promise: to offer "bear witness-based" conclusions to understand the world around u.s.a..

Yet when iv out of 5 meaning women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they're roofing up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, well-nigh likely.

In fact, the fundamental author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that merits to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro brand the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant hazard of adverse events? For example, here'southward some other report he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That study concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected condom concerns afterwards TIV-ID."

But is that conclusion based on bad math, similar the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? Nosotros call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study builder has made the aforementioned systematic error (or perhaps a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. Information technology wouldn't exist the first time 1 author was found to have made systematic mistakes beyond dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and enervating they be addressed and corrected. We tin't but take bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't cheque out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the hateful time, it'due south clear that 4 out of v pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first xx weeks (at to the lowest degree, according to the small data set nosotros have so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine fasten proteins directly assault reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in significant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this equally a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to exist aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his ain words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet past 3.2 one thousand thousand over the next year, in the USA alone, if every pregnant adult female is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this instance, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "barbarism."

The fields of medicine and science have turned confronting humanity. They are now killing babies past the millions and injecting adults with fasten protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-built-in babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's land management czar once characterized human children equally an "environmental hazard."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes confronting humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the unabridged human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, merely are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.

Learn more in today's mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

scottdrand1956.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Bagikan Artikel ini